What
civil society organisations or institutions are
involved in monitoring public sector corruption?
Religious
institutions such as churches (318a) |
|
Tribal
or village associations (318b)
|
Transparency
International Country Chapter (318c) |
|
Other
Non-governmental organisations (318d)
Specification
(318e): Institute for Security Studies,
IDASA, Centre for the Study of Violence
and Reconciliation, Public Service Accountability
Monitor at Rhodes University
|
Please
describe any significant role or campaign that
any of these organisations have played recently
in fighting corruption or promoting ethics in
the public service. (319)
| The South
African Non-Governmental Coalition, SANGOCO
recently adopted an anti-corruption initiative
as well as its code of ethics. The NGO sector
is also involved in the Cross-Sectoral Task
Team hosted by the Public Service Commission |
Are
there any civic education programmes, those that
address issues of citizens rights and obligations,
transparency, democracy, public interest, ethical
values, etc., being currently carried out?

If yes,
by
whom?
How
has the presence of international donors e.g.
multilateral, bilateral, private, etc. contributed
to the corruption or unethical conduct in the
public service? (321)
| Beth
Hogan from USAID felt that South Africa was
different to other countries in that it was
not donors steering government in a specific
direction to tackle corrruption and encourage
good governance. Rather, South Africa was
an exampe to other countries. Whilst there
were some problems, comparataively speaking
USAID was encouraged that leadership arouind
fighting corruption was coming from within
the country.
David
Urquhart of AusAid was unaware of any examples.
He did however note that AusAid projects
were managed by Australians.
Laurie Lee from DFID noted that before money
is transferred to countries there must be
high levels of financial compliance. Capacity
building is done to ensure this and this
restricts the level of abuse or diversion
of donor funds as well as improving the
general systems that particular departments
have.
|
How
has their presence contributed to fighting corruption
and encouraging ethical conduct? (322)

| If yes, who has access and to what types of information? (249c) |
|
USAID is
assisting the South African government both
directly and indirectly in terms of various
projects. These included funding projects
related to the regulatory and financial
management issues within the minstry of
finance and municipal governments. It is
also assisting the Criminal Justice System,
in particular the Minsitry of Justice and
the National Director of Public Prosecustions
by responding to corruption. USAID provides
limited suppport to the National Democratic
Institute (NDI) which is assisting the Public
Service Commission in its anti-corruption
initiative, including the funding of publications
and hosting workshops.
AusAid has and continues to support the
Public Service Commision in deaing with
public sector ethics. This support includes
sending two South Africans to an anti-corruption
course in Australia. A separate study tour
in Australia was completed a couple of years
ago around this issue. In addition, they
have established the Africa Governance Fund
to encourage research projects around these
issues and will be funding a project at
the Institute for Securty Studies (ISS)
in 2000 on whistle-blower protection.
DFID has provided technical support to sectors
around general financial and performance
management and put in place systems to plan,
budget and monitor expenditure. In South
Africa they explicitly support the Anti-Corruption
Initiative by providing a 'fairly modest'
sum of £100 000.
|